tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3675007354134450838.post321541518146360812..comments2023-10-31T02:35:51.377-07:00Comments on SF Mobile Museum: 2010: analysis of 1San Francisco Mobile Museumhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03140124276485406486noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3675007354134450838.post-25697836063398482422011-01-03T22:21:58.048-08:002011-01-03T22:21:58.048-08:00Hey thanks. Yes, design was a big number one. The ...Hey thanks. Yes, design was a big number one. The way I see it, good design is basically being courteous. If you're going to honor the artists who participate, then you've likewise got to extend the same courtesy to other participants, or it feels unequal.San Francisco Mobile Museumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03140124276485406486noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3675007354134450838.post-75967468177912840432011-01-03T22:19:04.480-08:002011-01-03T22:19:04.480-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.San Francisco Mobile Museumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03140124276485406486noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3675007354134450838.post-26764570218465723782011-01-02T17:30:47.757-08:002011-01-02T17:30:47.757-08:00Thanks for sharing! What do you think changed the ...Thanks for sharing! What do you think changed the number of wisecracks? Design, prompt question, surrounding content?<br /><br />I think you are right on with the "consistent framing" for visitors thing. I think it's partly because there's visual power in the set that can add to the experience of each single object. I saw that with the MIA's Foot in Door exhibition (http://museumtwo.blogspot.com/2010/06/foot-in-door-powerful-participatory.html)Nina Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11723930679606298550noreply@blogger.com